reprinted from:

Visit the Chicago Sun-Times website


Economy won't hurt deal on Soldier Field
S&P won't cut rating of $399 million bond issue despite slump

 

By Fran Spielman
Copyright 2001 
Chicago Sun-Times, Inc.
Article date: September 22, 2001
 

A Wall Street rating agency said Friday it has no plans to downgrade its "A" rating for a $399 million Soldier Field bond issue, even though the borrowing is supported by hotel tax revenues sent plummeting by last week's hijackings. Standard & Poor's said it is confident that the economic slowdown in the airline and tourism industries will be temporary, that empty hotel rooms will be filled and that, even if the slowdown is prolonged, the bonds have ample financial support.

Unbeknownst to lawmakers who approved the stadium deal, the Soldier Field bonds are secured by the "first dollars collected from a 60 percent share of the 5 percent tax levied on hotel rooms statewide," said Standard & Poor's analyst Jeff Panger. The 2 percent tax increase on Chicago hotel rooms that financed Comiskey Park--and lawmakers thought would pay for Soldier Field--is being used to replenish the state advance.

But the Chicago-only tax--and Mayor Daley's pledge of up to $5 million a year from the city's share of the state income tax--is not providing what Panger called "bond holder security." That's why single-digit occupancy rates at Chicago hotels have not placed the "A" bond rating in jeopardy.

"Revenue can decline by 70 percent, and they would still have enough money to pay the bonds," Panger said. "If there was a prolonged economic slump that severely eroded revenues and coverage levels, then we would revisit the rating. But it's only in later years, when debt service increases, that there is some concern."

If the statewide tax grows at a rate of just 0.4 percent a year, the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority still would have enough money to make the payments on Soldier Field, he said.

The Chicago Sun-Times reported this week that the stadium authority plans to test the market before deciding whether to go forward with the Soldier Field bond issue, insured by Ambac Assurance Corp. On Friday, Ambac's senior managing director Howard Pfeffer declined to say whether the insurance commitment was in jeopardy.

Some in the General Assembly were outraged that state taxpayers could wind up paying for any shortfalls. "We were not told the whole truth," said Rep. Jack Franks (D-Woodstock), who voted against the Soldier Field package.

Contributing: Dave McKinney
 

In the News