reprinted from:

Visit the Chicago Sun-Times website


Aldermen left out of stadium deal;
Daley didn't consult council over city tax agreement
 

By Fran Spielman
Copyright 2000 
Chicago Sun-Times, Inc.
Article date: December 2, 2000
 

Chicago aldermen already had their noses out of joint about not being shown the glitzy model of the new Soldier Field. Now Mayor Daley has pledged city tax dollars to back up stadium bonds without even consulting them.

"That was just a fallback that, truthfully, the Republicans wanted," Daley said Thursday as the General Assembly was ending the long-running Bears stadium saga.

"We were very conservative in protecting the taxpayers' money. That money is there. Our hotel business dealing with conventions and tourists is very, very strong. In the last 10 years, it keeps growing tremendously. We're very confident in our forecasts dealing with the hotel tax. We're fully protected on it. And if not, we're going to be repaid."

Soldier Field bonds will be retired by the same 2 percent increase in Chicago's hotel tax that financed Comiskey Park. The state got involved because it needed to authorize the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority to issue $ 387 million in bonds that will be paid by surplus revenues from the hotel tax.

The financing scheme assumes the tax will continue to grow at an annual rate of 5 percent.

If those projections prove too rosy, or if the cyclical hotel business takes a dive, Daley has agreed to make up the difference by allowing the state to withhold a portion of the city's share of state income tax.

The question floating around City Hall is whether the city tax commitment needs City Council approval.

"I don't know. I'll find out. I don't have the answer," the mayor said.

A City Hall source close to the stadium negotiations insisted City Council approval was not required.

"The City Council didn't put the state income tax into effect. They have no right to allocate it. The Illinois Legislature decides the city's share," the source said.

Finance Committee Chairman Edward M. Burke (14th), the council's resident expert on legal matters, could not be reached for comment on the tax question.

Ald. William Beavers (7th) said he plans to extract his pound of flesh when the stadium project comes up for zoning approval, whether or not aldermen are bypassed on the tax question.

"I see a number of opportunities for minorities to participate in the concessions at Soldier Field, and I want to make sure we get our fair share," Beavers said.

"I don't have any problem with him pledging city money if I'm able to get something out of it. If I don't, I'll have to do something else. He still has to come before the City Council."

If Daley can pledge city tax dollars to backstop a Bears stadium, CTA riders may demand to know why the city can't scrape up the money to reverse CTA service cuts by increasing an annual contribution to the transit agency that has been frozen at $ 3 million since the 1970s, said Ald. Freddrenna Lyle (6th).

"Clearly, they would be concerned that we do have our priorities misplaced," Lyle said.

Jacqueline Leavy, executive director of the Neighborhood Capital Budget Group, a taxpayer watchdog group, questioned the "back-door dealings" that allowed Daley to pull his legislative end run around the City Council.

"The City Council has not been consulted, taxpayers are being left in the dark about what the impact is going to be on the city's financial situation and what the trade-offs will be if those monies are pledged to back this deal," Leavy said. "If there is wiggle room for the city to make strategic investments (in a football stadium), then certainly increasing the city's financial support to the CTA is paramount. We still have vast areas of our neighborhoods that are underserved as a result of the last service cuts."
 

In the News