|
reprinted from:

Columbia,
S.C.-area officials weigh costs of football bowl game
By Jeff Wilkinson
Copyright 2001 The
State
Article date: August 10, 2001
The proposed
Palmetto Bowl would cost taxpayers about $450,000 and local sponsors another
$500,000, city of Columbia officials said on Thursday.
Local boosters anticipate that Columbia, Richland County and Lexington
County might each be asked to contribute $150,000 in hotel-motel bed taxes
to support the orphan Aloha Bowl.
But raising the money would be contingent on the USC Board of Trustees
reversing a decision by athletics director Mike McGee not to allow the game
to be played in Williams-Brice Stadium.
The board is expected to discuss the issue, formally or informally, at its
meeting today.
Gov. Jim Hodges and key members of the S.C. General Assembly have asked the
board to reconsider the athletics department's decision.
Palmetto Bowl boosters estimate that 20,000 fans would spend enough to
justify the outlay of accommodations tax funds.
City council member Jim Papadea pointed to Mobile, Ala., which draws a
direct economic benefit of $10 million to $11 million each year from the
GMAC Bowl, played the week before Christmas.
The Palmetto Bowl would be played on Christmas Day.
"If you can spend $1 million to get back $10 million on a four-day
event, then you ought to do it," he said.
Columbia Mayor Bob Coble said that in addition to financial benefits, the 3
1/2-hour broadcast on ABC would be good publicity for the city, the
university and the state.
"From the Confederate flag to Susan Smith, controversy has been about
the only national coverage we've had," he said. "South Carolina
needs favorable press attention."
But the county councils might be a tough sell.
"It would take a whole lot of exhaustive investigation into this before
we committed our accommodations tax," Lexington County Council chairman
Bruce Rucker said. "I didn't say I wouldn't do it. But it would take a
whole lot of investigation."
Richland County Council vice chairman Greg Pearce said that county is tapped
out.
"We don't have it," he said. "I wish the pot were larger;
then we could look at it."
Both Rucker and Pearce noted that tens of millions of dollars of the
counties' accommodations tax money are being funneled to USC's new
basketball arena and Columbia's planned regional convention center.
Tom Sponseller, president and CEO of the Hospitality Association of South
Carolina, said his members -- hoteliers and restaurateurs -- strongly
support playing the game in Columbia.
He predicted that the game could sell out the area's 8,000 to 9,000 hotel
rooms.
"December is one of the slowest months for restaurants and
hotels," he said. "Even if they only fill half of that stadium,
they will sell out all of the hotel rooms. That would be a bigger day for us
than a Gamecock home game."
Ike McLeese, president and CEO of the Greater Columbia chamber of Commerce,
said that raising $500,000 in sponsorships from the business community
shouldn't be a problem.
"I had enough interest around the table at my executive committee
meeting this morning to cover it," he said.
McLeese said that the $500,000 is less than the sponsorships raised for
Columbia's 3 Rivers Music Festival, held in April the last two years.
"I feel confident we could do even more," he said.
But the bowl committee's soliciting sponsorships is part of the reason for
the university's opposition, athletics director McGee said.
"The athletics department will soon present plans to expand
Williams-Brice Stadium, hopefully in the very near future," he wrote in
a letter to The State.
"... To accomplish this ... additional corporate support for executive
suites and premium seating will be essential," he wrote. "This
same corporate support will be essential to and sought by the bowl
promoters."
Terry Daw of Aloha Sports, the firm wanting to move the game here, would not
comment on the amount of local support it would require.
"We want to resolve whether the stadium is available," he said.
But he added that Aloha Sports is continuing negotiations with the city of
Anaheim, Calif., for the game to be played at Edison Field, the home of the
Anaheim Angels Major League Baseball team.
"We'll weigh both options, and when we have positions from both, we'll
evaluate them and make a decision," Daw said.
City of Anaheim spokesman John Nicoletti said that city is moving forward
with efforts to land the game.
"At this point, there is a lot of interest," he said.
"Whether the financial commitment (from the business community) is
there remains to be seen."
Aloha Sports also organizes the Oahu Bowl, which has been moved to Seattle
and renamed the Seattle Bowl.
Daw said the firm is seeking an East Coast site because two of the three
conference affiliations -- the Atlantic Coast Conference and the Big East
Conference -- are on the East Coast.
"We would like to diversify" so that East Coast fans could drive
to a bowl game in Columbia featuring the ACC or the Big East, and West Coast
fans could drive to Seattle to see a Pac-10 team, he said.
Daw said he and partner Fritz Rohfling will remain in town to try to put a
deal together.
"We have not set a deadline," he said. "But we would like to
have some answers as soon as possible."
It would take about two to three months to organize the event once a
decision is made, Daw said.
"I think Columbia could mobilize pretty quickly," he said.
In the News
|